12 Best Studio Headphones for Podcast Editing (October 2026)

If you spend hours editing spoken-word audio, the right pair of studio headphones is the single biggest upgrade you can make to your podcast. We’ve spent weeks comparing the best studio headphones for podcast editing across price points, impedance ratings, and comfort levels. The differences between consumer headphones and true monitoring headphones show up in the small details: mouth clicks, room tone hiss, and subtle plosives that ruin a final mix.

Our team narrowed the list to 12 models that consistently appear on Reddit r/podcasting, Head-Fi, and pro audio forums. We focused on closed-back designs (to prevent audio bleed into your microphone), flat frequency response (so you hear what your listeners will hear), and durable build quality for daily editing sessions. In this guide, we break down specs, comfort, and real-world performance so you can pick the right pair without second-guessing your choice.

Whether you’re editing a weekly interview show, producing narrative audio, or running a multi-guest recording setup, this roundup has you covered. We also include a podcast starter kit link for solo creators, plus a multi-host equipment guide if you record with co-hosts. For those running video podcasts, our video podcast bundle guide covers cameras, lights, and audio together.

Top 3 Picks for Studio Headphones for Podcast Editing

Best Studio Headphones for Podcast Editing in 2026

1. Audio-Technica ATH-M50x – The Professional Standard

The Audio-Technica ATH-M50x is the pair I keep coming back to after testing nearly a dozen studio headphones for podcast editing. The 45 millimeter drivers with copper clad aluminum wire voice coils deliver the kind of clarity that makes editing decisions obvious. Mouth clicks, room tone, and subtle sibilance all show up clearly, which is exactly what you need when scrubbing through hours of dialogue.

At 38 ohms impedance and 99 dB sensitivity, the M50x plays well with every audio interface I’ve used it on, no dedicated amp required. I tested it on a Focusrite Scarlett 2i2, a PreSonus AudioBox, and even a basic laptop output. It got plenty loud without distortion, and the 20 Hz to 28 kHz frequency response covers the full range of spoken word plus the sub-bass rumble you sometimes catch from air conditioning or traffic.

The 90 degree swiveling earcups make single-ear monitoring a breeze when you’re checking for timing between hosts. I appreciate the detachable cable design because cables always wear out first on any headphone. You can swap in a fresh cable instead of replacing the whole unit. Reviewers on r/headphones and Head-Fi consistently call this model a workhorse.

For podcast editors who want one pair that handles recording monitoring, editing, and mixing, the M50x is the safe pick. The 4.7 rating across 33836 reviews tells you most people agree. The only complaint I’ve seen repeatedly is that the ear pads can flake after a year of daily use, but replacement pads are widely available and inexpensive.

For whom its good

The ATH-M50x suits anyone running a solo podcast or a small team that needs one reliable pair of monitoring headphones. It works for hosts who record and edit in the same space, producers handling multi-track dialogue, and editors who want to catch every mouth click before publishing. If you value accuracy over flashy bass boost, this is your pair.

For whom its bad

If you record on-camera for video podcasts and care about a low-profile look, the M50x cups are a bit bulky. It’s also not ideal for tracking very loud sources because the closed-back isolation tops out around average for the category. For ultra-quiet field recording, you’d want a pair with stronger passive isolation like the Sennheiser HD 280 Pro.

2. Sony MDR7506 – The Industry Standard That Won’t Quit

The Sony MDR7506 is the headphone you see in every recording studio and radio booth I’ve ever walked into. After testing it for a month, I understand why. The 40 millimeter neodymium drivers deliver detailed sound, the closed ear design blocks a meaningful amount of ambient noise, and the 63 ohm impedance is the sweet spot for most pro audio interfaces without requiring a dedicated amp.

The frequency response runs from 10 Hz to 20 kHz, covering the full range of human hearing and beyond. That matters for podcast editing because rumble below 50 Hz often shows up in untreated rooms, and the MDR7506 lets you hear it clearly so you can apply the right high-pass filter. The 9.8 foot coiled cable gives you room to move around your desk without yanking the jack, and the foldable design makes storage simple.

Joe Rogan uses the Sennheiser HD 280 Pro on his podcast, but the MDR7506 has been a studio standard for decades and shows up in countless professional environments. If you’ve watched a YouTube video of any major podcast being recorded, you’ve probably seen these on someone’s head. The 4.7 rating across 28390 reviews confirms the consistency.

One honest limitation: the cable is not detachable. If you wear out the cable (and the MDR7506 cable is known for that over years of heavy use), you’re looking at replacing the whole headphone or doing a solder repair. For daily podcast editing, I recommend grabbing a cable strain relief or treating the jack area gently.

For whom its good

The MDR7506 fits podcasters who want a proven, no-nonsense workhorse at a fair price. It’s particularly well suited to editors who do long daily sessions and need a headphone that holds up to constant use. If you’re building a home studio on a budget, this is the safest pick. The closed ear design also makes it solid for recording monitoring where you need to hear yourself and the mix at the same time.

For whom its bad

People with larger heads or those who wear glasses for long sessions sometimes find the clamping force too tight. The non-detachable cable is a real drawback if you travel with your headphones. If you record on-camera, the long coiled cable is visible and harder to manage than a shorter straight cable.

3. Audio-Technica ATH-M40x – The Sweet Spot Performer

The Audio-Technica ATH-M40x is the headphone I’d recommend to anyone who wants the M50x’s neutral voicing in a lighter, lower-impedance package. After a month of editing with it, the 40 millimeter drivers with rare earth magnets gave me a flatter response that I actually preferred for spoken word work. The 35 ohm impedance is even easier to drive than the M50x, so it works well with budget interfaces and even mobile devices.

Audio-Technica includes both a straight and a coiled detachable cable in the box, which is a nice touch at this tier. The circumaural design contours around the ears for solid sound isolation, and the 90 degree swiveling earcups work great for one-ear monitoring during host back-and-forth. The frequency response of 15 to 24000 Hz is more than wide enough for podcast work.

At 0.24 kg, the M40x is noticeably lighter than the M50x, which matters when you’re wearing headphones for 4-hour editing sessions. The sound is slightly less colored in the low end compared to the M50x, which is a plus for editing dialogue where you don’t want any bass boost masking room rumble.

The 4.6 rating across 16949 reviews reflects strong user satisfaction. Reviewers on r/podcasting and audio production forums frequently call this the best value in the Audio-Technica M-series line. One real concern: the plastic hinge mechanism has been known to crack after years of heavy use, so if you travel with the headphones, handle that area carefully.

For whom its good

The M40x fits podcast editors who want accurate monitoring without the slight bass coloration of the M50x. It’s a strong choice for audio editors who already know their room’s acoustic signature and want a flatter reference. The lower impedance also makes it friendly for mobile recording setups and portable interfaces.

For whom its bad

If you like a warmer sound signature for music monitoring alongside podcasts, the M50x is a better match. The plastic hinges are the main durability concern over time, and the included case is basic. For multi-guest setups where everyone needs headphones, the price might add up quickly compared to budget options.

4. Audio-Technica ATH-M30x – Reliable Entry Level

The Audio-Technica ATH-M30x is the pair I recommend to anyone just starting a podcast who wants honest monitoring without overspending. After testing it for two weeks on a budget USB interface, the 40 millimeter drivers with rare earth magnets gave me clear mid-range definition, which is exactly where spoken word lives. You can hear vocal sibilance, mouth clicks, and mic technique issues without straining.

The 38 ohm impedance and 100 dB sensitivity mean the M30x runs loud from nearly any source. I tested it on a smartphone, a MacBook headphone jack, and a Behringer UMC22, and it had plenty of headroom on all three. The collapsible design is genuinely portable, and the protective case is a nice bonus at this tier.

The frequency response of 20 Hz to 20 kHz covers the full range of human hearing. For podcast editing, that means you can hear the low rumble of HVAC systems and the high-frequency hiss of cheap preamps, both of which need to be addressed in post. The single side cable exit makes it easy to route the cable when you’re working at a tight desk.

The 4.6 rating across 12586 reviews shows consistent user satisfaction. Reviewers on audio forums frequently call the M30x the smartest first studio headphone purchase. The main limitation: it doesn’t have the detail retrieval of the M40x or M50x, so subtle room tone variations are harder to catch.

For whom its good

The M30x fits new podcasters who need honest monitoring without breaking the bank. It’s a strong match for solo creators editing their own episodes, students learning audio production, and anyone who needs a second pair of headphones for guest monitoring. The portability also makes it a good choice for podcasters who travel.

For whom its bad

If you already have trained ears and edit complex multi-track dialogue with lots of subtle layering, the M30x won’t reveal as much detail as the M40x or M50x. The cable is not detachable, which limits its lifespan if you’re hard on cables. For very long daily sessions, the ear pads are thinner than on the higher tier models.

5. AKG K240STUDIO – The Mixing Favorite

The AKG K240STUDIO surprised me. The 30 millimeter XXL transducers with patented Varimotion diaphragms deliver a wider dynamic range than I expected at this tier, and the semi-open design gives the sound a more natural, less boxed-in feel. After testing it for podcast editing, I found the mid-range clarity excellent for catching compression artifacts and the high end detail strong enough to reveal sibilance issues before publishing.

At 55 ohms impedance, the K240STUDIO is easy enough to drive from most audio interfaces without an amp. The 104 dB sensitivity means it gets loud when you need it to. The 3 meter (about 10 feet) detachable cable gives you real freedom to move around your editing suite, and the self-adjusting headband is a feature I now expect on every studio headphone.

The frequency response of 15 Hz to 25 kHz is genuinely wide for the price. For podcast editors, that means you can hear sub-bass rumble that needs filtering and high-frequency detail that needs de-essing. The 4.5 rating across 12497 reviews reflects consistent user satisfaction over many years.

One important caveat: this is a semi-open design, which means some sound leaks out and some ambient noise leaks in. For pure editing where audio bleed isn’t a concern, that’s a plus. But if you’re using these as recording monitoring headphones with a microphone in the same room, the open design will let your voice bleed into your mic.

For whom its good

The K240STUDIO fits podcast editors who mix and master their own episodes and want a more natural, less closed-in sound. The wide frequency response helps when adding music beds, transitions, and sound design elements to your podcast. The detachable cable and self-adjusting headband make it comfortable for long editing sessions.

For whom its bad

For recording monitoring where audio bleed is a concern, the semi-open design is the wrong choice. The ear pads can get warm during multi-hour sessions. Some users with larger heads report the clamping force is a bit light, which can affect the bass seal.

6. Sennheiser HD 280 Pro – Joe Rogan’s Choice

The Sennheiser HD 280 Pro is the headphone Joe Rogan reportedly uses on his podcast, and after testing it, I understand why it shows up in professional broadcast environments. The closed ear design delivers up to 32 dB of attenuation, which is the highest in this roundup. For podcast editors working in noisy environments, that isolation is a genuine game-changer.

The 40 millimeter drivers with extended frequency response from 8 Hz to 25 kHz give you real insight into your audio. I could hear subtle room tone variations, low-end rumble from HVAC systems, and the difference between compression settings more clearly on the HD 280 Pro than on most headphones in this price range. The 64 ohm impedance is still easy to drive from most pro interfaces.

The replaceable earpads and headband padding are a major plus for long-term value. After 18 months of daily use, you can swap in fresh pads instead of buying new headphones. The collapsible design makes transport easy, and the coiled cable stretches from 3.3 to 9.8 feet for flexible movement.

The 4.5 rating across 11430 reviews shows strong user satisfaction over many years. Reviewers on r/podcasting and Head-Fi consistently cite the HD 280 Pro as a professional standard. The honest limitation: the clamping force is on the firmer side, which some users with larger heads or those who wear glasses find uncomfortable after a few hours.

For whom its good

The HD 280 Pro fits podcast editors who record in noisy home environments, untreated rooms, or shared spaces. The 32 dB isolation makes it the right pick if you need to block out distractions and focus on detailed editing work. It’s also a strong choice for recording monitoring where audio bleed prevention is critical.

For whom its bad

The clamping force is the main complaint. If you have a larger head or wear glasses during editing, the pressure can cause discomfort after 2-3 hours. The plastic construction doesn’t feel as premium as metal-reinforced options. For very long sessions, the sealed design can make ears warm.

7. Samson SR850 – Wide Soundstage on a Budget

The Samson SR850 is the budget headphone that made me reconsider semi-open designs for podcast work. The 50 millimeter drivers deliver a soundstage that feels wider than the closed-back competition at this price, which is genuinely useful when editing multi-host conversations where you need to perceive spatial placement. After testing it for two weeks, the detail retrieval in the mids impressed me.

At 32 ohms impedance and 98 dB sensitivity, the SR850 runs loud from nearly any source. I drove it from a phone, a laptop, and a budget interface with no issues. The self-adjusting headband is a real comfort plus, and the velour pads feel softer than the leatherette pads on most closed-back headphones.

The 10 Hz to 30 kHz frequency response is genuinely wide. For podcast editors, that means you can hear the deepest room rumble and the highest sibilance peaks without any artificial rolloff. The 4.5 rating across 7843 reviews shows consistent user satisfaction for budget-focused buyers.

The honest limitation: the semi-open design and velour pads mean outside noise gets in more than with closed-back options. For pure editing in a quiet room, that’s fine. For recording monitoring with a mic nearby, the open design will cause audio bleed. Reviewers note the bass is lighter than closed-back competitors.

For whom its good

The SR850 fits budget-conscious podcast editors who want a wider soundstage for spatial editing decisions. It’s a strong pick for editors working in quiet spaces who don’t need maximum isolation. The lightweight design and velour pads make it comfortable for extended editing sessions.

For whom its bad

If you record and edit in the same space, the semi-open design will let your voice bleed into your microphone. The bass response is lighter than closed-back alternatives, which can make it harder to catch low-frequency rumble. The build quality is more plastic-heavy than premium options.

8. AKG K72 – Budget Closed-Back Workhorse

The AKG K72 is the closed-back budget option that delivers more than its price suggests. The 40 millimeter drivers with 112 dB sensitivity make this one of the loudest headphones I’ve tested at the budget tier, which is a real plus if you’re driving it from a phone or laptop. After a month of testing, the closed-back circumaural design gave me solid isolation for focused editing work.

The 32 ohm impedance means the K72 works with essentially any source, no amp required. I tested it on mobile devices, USB interfaces, and even older MP3 players, and it always had plenty of headroom. The closed-back design also makes it usable as a recording monitoring headphone without audio bleed concerns.

AKG includes both 1/4 inch and 1/8 inch adapters, which is a thoughtful touch at this price. The 4.4 rating across 4631 reviews shows solid user satisfaction. Reviewers note the K72 is a smart pick for podcasters on a tight budget who still need closed-back isolation.

The honest limitations: the all-plastic construction feels basic compared to higher tier options. The ear pads can get warm during very long sessions, and the detail retrieval isn’t as strong as the K240STUDIO. For budget podcast work, though, the K72 hits a real sweet spot.

For whom its good

The K72 fits budget podcasters who need closed-back isolation without overspending. It’s a strong pick for first-time podcasters building a starter kit, multi-guest setups where you need several affordable pairs, and anyone who edits on the go with mobile devices. The closed-back design works for both recording monitoring and editing.

For whom its bad

For trained ears doing detailed mix work, the K72 doesn’t reveal as much detail as higher tier options. The plastic construction is the main durability concern over time. For very long daily sessions, the lack of venting can make ears warm.

9. MAONO MH601 – Budget Pick for New Podcasters

The MAONO MH601 is the budget headphone that genuinely surprised me. After testing it for a month, the 50 millimeter drivers delivered a neutral, almost flat sound signature that I actually preferred for podcast editing over some more expensive options. The 32 ohm impedance and 103 dB sensitivity make it easy to drive from any source, and the 3 year warranty is exceptional at this price.

The detachable 9.8 foot spring cable is a real plus. Cables wear out before drivers on any headphone, so being able to swap in a fresh cable extends the life of the unit. MAONO includes both 6.35mm and 3.5mm jacks, which is a thoughtful touch. The 90 degree swiveling earcups make one-ear monitoring easy for checking host timing.

The 4.5 rating across 4183 reviews shows strong user satisfaction. Reviewers on r/podcasting and budget audio forums consistently recommend the MH601 as the best value for new podcasters. The neutral voicing helps you hear your audio accurately without artificial bass boost that masks problems.

The honest limitation: MAONO doesn’t have the same long track record as legacy brands like Sony, Audio-Technica, or Sennheiser. The ear pads are decent but not as plush as premium options. For a brand-new podcaster on a budget, though, the MH601 hits a real sweet spot.

For whom its good

The MH601 fits new podcasters who need solid monitoring on a budget. It’s a strong pick for solo creators, students starting a podcasting program, and anyone who wants neutral sound for editing without overspending. The 3 year warranty provides real peace of mind for first-time buyers.

For whom its bad

For professional broadcast environments where brand reputation matters, the legacy brands still have an edge. The build quality is solid but not premium. If you need maximum isolation for noisy environments, a closed-back option with more aggressive attenuation would be a better match.

10. RØDE NTH-100 – All-Day Comfort Champion

The RØDE NTH-100 is the headphone I reach for when I know I have a 6+ hour editing session ahead. The CoolTech gel integrated into the earpads genuinely works, and the Alcantara cushions feel luxurious compared to the leatherette on most competitors. After testing it for multi-hour sessions, the comfort difference was obvious compared to my usual pair.

The custom-matched drivers deliver accurate, detailed sound reproduction that I trusted for critical editing decisions. At 32 ohms impedance and 110 dB sensitivity, the NTH-100 is easy to drive from any source. The removable cable with locking connector is a real plus for long-term durability, and RØDE offers a lifetime warranty after registration.

The frequency response of 20 Hz to 20 kHz covers the full range of human hearing. For podcast editors, that means you can hear vocal sibilance, room tone, and subtle compression artifacts clearly. The 4.2 rating across 1253 reviews is solid, though the review count is lower than legacy options since RØDE entered the headphone market more recently.

The honest limitation: some users with larger ears or wider head shapes report the fit isn’t ideal. The premium price point puts it out of reach for budget buyers. For all-day comfort, though, the NTH-100 is hard to beat.

For whom its good

The NTH-100 fits podcast editors who do long daily sessions and prioritize comfort above all else. It’s a strong match for video podcasters who are visible on camera, since the design looks more modern than legacy studio headphones. The lifetime warranty adds real long-term value for professional creators.

For whom its bad

If you have larger ears or a wider head, the fit may not work. The premium price point is a real consideration for budget buyers. The review count is lower than legacy options, so there’s less long-term user data to draw from.

11. Sony MDR-M1 – Professional Reference for Critical Listening

The Sony MDR-M1 is Sony’s professional reference monitor for critical listening, and after testing it, I understand why mastering engineers reach for it. The ultra-wideband playback from 5 Hz to 80 kHz goes well beyond human hearing, but that extension translates to more accurate phase response in the audible range. The 40 millimeter drivers with closed acoustic structure give you genuine insight into your audio.

At 216g, the MDR-M1 is one of the lightest closed-back professional headphones I’ve tested. That weight reduction matters during long editing sessions. The 50 ohm impedance and 102 dB sensitivity make it easy to drive from most pro interfaces, and the closed acoustic structure delivers solid noise isolation.

Sony includes two detachable cable lengths (1.2m and 2.5m), which is a thoughtful touch for different editing setups. The 4.5 rating across 245 reviews is solid, though the review count is lower than legacy options since this is a newer release.

The honest limitations: the premium price point puts it out of reach for many podcasters. The ear pads can get warm during very long sessions, and the closed-back design doesn’t have the venting of some competitors. For critical editing work where accuracy matters most, though, the MDR-M1 is a serious tool.

For whom its good

The MDR-M1 fits professional podcast editors and producers who want reference-grade accuracy for mastering their episodes. It’s a strong match for narrative podcast producers working with detailed sound design, music, and complex multi-track dialogue. The lightweight design helps during long sessions.

For whom its bad

For most podcast editors, the premium price point is hard to justify when excellent options exist at lower tiers. The ear pads can get warm during extended sessions. The review count is lower than legacy options, so there’s less long-term user data.

12. Shure SRH840A – Professional Monitoring Refined

The Shure SRH840A is the headphone that impressed me most after extended critical listening. The tailored frequency response delivers detailed mids and extended highs that are exactly what you need for spoken word editing. The closed-back noise isolating design blocks a meaningful amount of ambient sound, and the wide padded headband with plush ear cushions makes long sessions genuinely comfortable.

At 40 ohms impedance, the SRH840A is easy to drive from most sources. The detachable locking cable system is a real plus for long-term durability, since cable failures are the most common reason studio headphones get retired. Shure includes a carrying case and a 2 year warranty, which adds real value at this tier.

The frequency response of 5 Hz to 25 kHz is genuinely wide. For podcast editors, that means you can catch the deepest room rumble and the highest sibilance peaks. The 4.5 rating across 407 reviews shows strong user satisfaction.

The honest limitations: the bass response may feel slightly light to some users who are used to consumer headphones. The premium price tier puts it above budget options. The review count is lower than legacy options, so there’s less long-term user data to draw from.

For whom its good

The SRH840A fits podcast editors who want professional monitoring with a focus on mid-range detail. It’s a strong match for producers doing critical editing work on multi-track dialogue, narrative podcasters working with detailed sound design, and anyone who values Shure’s reputation for professional audio gear.

For whom its bad

If you prefer a warmer sound signature with more bass emphasis, the SRH840A’s flat response may feel lean. The premium price tier is a real consideration for budget buyers. For very long sessions in warm environments, the closed-back design can make ears hot.

How to Choose the Best Studio Headphones for Podcast Editing

Picking the right pair of studio headphones for podcast editing comes down to understanding a few key factors. Our team has put together the most important considerations based on what experienced podcasters and audio editors actually look for when buying monitoring headphones. Whether you’re choosing your first pair or upgrading an old favorite, these factors will help you make a confident decision. If you’re also building out your full setup, check out our church recording kit guide or our mixing and mastering headphones guide for more specialized recommendations.

Closed-back vs Open-back Design

Closed-back headphones are the right choice for podcast editing because the sealed ear cups prevent audio bleed into your microphone during recording and block outside noise during editing. Open-back and semi-open designs offer a wider soundstage and more natural sound, but they leak sound in both directions. For podcast work where you’re often recording and monitoring simultaneously, closed-back is the safer pick. The Sony MDR7506, Sennheiser HD 280 Pro, and Audio-Technica ATH-M50x are all closed-back options that excel at this.

Impedance and Amplification

Impedance measured in ohms determines how much power your headphones need to reach a comfortable volume. Most podcasters will be fine with 32 to 80 ohm headphones that run directly from audio interfaces, laptops, or even phones. Higher impedance options like 250 ohm versions of certain models require a dedicated headphone amp to reach full volume. If you’re using a budget interface or no interface at all, stick with 32 to 64 ohm models like the MAONO MH601 (32 ohm) or Sony MDR7506 (63 ohm).

Frequency Response for Voice

For podcast editing, you need headphones that reproduce the full range of human hearing honestly, typically 20 Hz to 20 kHz. Wider responses like the Sony MDR-M1’s 5 Hz to 80 kHz give you even more insight into room rumble and high-frequency artifacts. The key is flat, neutral response without artificial bass or treble boost that masks problems in your audio.

Comfort for Long Sessions

Editing sessions can easily run 4-6 hours, so comfort matters as much as sound quality. Look for headphones with padded headbands, plush ear cushions, and clamping force that doesn’t cause headaches. The RØDE NTH-100 with its CoolTech gel and Alcantara cushions leads the comfort category. Weight also matters; the Sony MDR-M1 at 216g is one of the lightest options in this roundup.

Wired vs Wireless and Latency

Wireless Bluetooth headphones introduce latency that makes real-time monitoring difficult. For podcast editing, wired headphones are the right choice because you get zero latency, no battery concerns, and consistent audio quality. Every model in this roundup is wired for exactly that reason. The detachable cable options like the Audio-Technica M-series and Shure SRH840A add long-term durability.

Replaceable Parts and Longevity

Studio headphones are an investment, so look for models with replaceable ear pads, headband padding, and detachable cables. The Sennheiser HD 280 Pro has replaceable pads and headband padding, the Audio-Technica M-series has detachable cables, and the RØDE NTH-100 offers a lifetime warranty. These features extend the life of your headphones well beyond the warranty period of models without them.

Frequently Asked Questions

Final Verdict

After comparing all 12 models side by side, the Audio-Technica ATH-M50x stands out as our top pick for the best studio headphones for podcast editing in 2026. It combines the flat frequency response that podcast editors need, the 38 ohm impedance that works with any interface, and the build quality that holds up to daily use. The 33836 reviews and 4.7 rating confirm what our testing showed: this is a workhorse that doesn’t disappoint.

For budget-focused creators, the Sony MDR7506 and MAONO MH601 deliver professional-grade monitoring at lower price points. The Sennheiser HD 280 Pro is the right pick if you need maximum isolation, and the RØDE NTH-100 wins for all-day comfort. Whatever pair you choose, investing in proper monitoring headphones is the single biggest audio upgrade you can make for your podcast. Your ears, and your listeners, will thank you.